<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 802 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301745</link>
    <description>Where allegations against a police officer arise from investigation or custody and bear a reasonable connection with official duty, prior sanction is a condition precedent to cognizance under the CrPC and the Karnataka Police Act, even if the complaint alleges illegality or excess of duty. Acts done in excess of duty or under colour of duty remain within the statutory protection when they are not wholly unconnected with official functions. Because the complaint was ex facie barred for want of sanction, the SC held that it could be quashed in inherent jurisdiction rather than sent back for discharge proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:06:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 802 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301745</link>
      <description>Where allegations against a police officer arise from investigation or custody and bear a reasonable connection with official duty, prior sanction is a condition precedent to cognizance under the CrPC and the Karnataka Police Act, even if the complaint alleges illegality or excess of duty. Acts done in excess of duty or under colour of duty remain within the statutory protection when they are not wholly unconnected with official functions. Because the complaint was ex facie barred for want of sanction, the SC held that it could be quashed in inherent jurisdiction rather than sent back for discharge proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>