https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301721 The court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the rejection of their request for interest reduction and the demand raised through a one-time settlement. The court found that the petitioners had already filed multiple petitions on the same issues, failed to comply with interim orders, and misled the court. The court held that the petitioners could not re-agitate the matters that were already adjudicated and deemed the filing of the instant petition as an abuse of the legal process, dismissing it at the threshold. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:52:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301721 The court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging the rejection of their request for interest reduction and the demand raised through a one-time settlement. The court found that the petitioners had already filed multiple petitions on the same issues, failed to comply with interim orders, and misled the court. The court held that the petitioners could not re-agitate the matters that were already adjudicated and deemed the filing of the instant petition as an abuse of the legal process, dismissing it at the threshold. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301721