<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 35 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28628</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, instead of setting it aside for a fresh hearing by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. The Court found that the penalty was imposed without giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard, making the penalty order unsustainable. Due to the expiration of the limitation period under section 275 of the Act, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs of Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 35 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28628</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, instead of setting it aside for a fresh hearing by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. The Court found that the penalty was imposed without giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard, making the penalty order unsustainable. Due to the expiration of the limitation period under section 275 of the Act, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs of Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>