<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1640 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301728</link>
    <description>The SC dealt with an interim request for protection against coercive action under an impugned order and for issuance of notice. Delay was condoned, notice was issued returnable after three weeks, dasti service was permitted, and the impugned direction on coercive action was stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2022 19:52:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1640 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301728</link>
      <description>The SC dealt with an interim request for protection against coercive action under an impugned order and for issuance of notice. Delay was condoned, notice was issued returnable after three weeks, dasti service was permitted, and the impugned direction on coercive action was stayed pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>