https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301707 Reliable eyewitness testimony was upheld because the medical evidence did not make the prosecution version impossible; a speculative mismatch between injuries and arrow use was insufficient to discard direct evidence. The first information report was treated as non-substantive evidence, usable only against its maker, and could not be relied on to reject other eyewitnesses whose accounts were otherwise accepted. On sentence, the gravity of the murders, including the attack on unarmed fleeing persons and the communal motive, justified the death penalty, and no mitigating factor warranted interference. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:51:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301707 Reliable eyewitness testimony was upheld because the medical evidence did not make the prosecution version impossible; a speculative mismatch between injuries and arrow use was insufficient to discard direct evidence. The first information report was treated as non-substantive evidence, usable only against its maker, and could not be relied on to reject other eyewitnesses whose accounts were otherwise accepted. On sentence, the gravity of the murders, including the attack on unarmed fleeing persons and the communal motive, justified the death penalty, and no mitigating factor warranted interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301707