https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301702 Revisional interference with an acquittal is confined to exceptional circumstances such as manifest illegality, serious procedural error, or miscarriage of justice. Where the Magistrate considered relevant material, found cheating unproved, and neither excluded nor overlooked material evidence, interference is not justified. Cheating and cheque dishonour have distinct ingredients: cheating requires dishonest inducement at the transaction stage, while cheque dishonour requires a cheque issued towards a legally enforceable liability, dishonour, and non-payment after demand. An acquittal for cheating therefore does not trigger double jeopardy, issue estoppel, or the bar against a subsequent prosecution for cheque dishonour. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Apr 2022 12:57:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301702 Revisional interference with an acquittal is confined to exceptional circumstances such as manifest illegality, serious procedural error, or miscarriage of justice. Where the Magistrate considered relevant material, found cheating unproved, and neither excluded nor overlooked material evidence, interference is not justified. Cheating and cheque dishonour have distinct ingredients: cheating requires dishonest inducement at the transaction stage, while cheque dishonour requires a cheque issued towards a legally enforceable liability, dishonour, and non-payment after demand. An acquittal for cheating therefore does not trigger double jeopardy, issue estoppel, or the bar against a subsequent prosecution for cheque dishonour. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301702