https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421084 The Court refused to condone a 1310-day delay in filing an appeal challenging the Tribunal's order interpreting Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. As a result, the application seeking condonation was dismissed, leading to the closure of both the appeal for interim relief and the main appeal. The Court emphasized the appellant's responsibility to ensure correct address details for order delivery and criticized the delay in seeking information about the appeal status, ultimately upholding the importance of timely action and dismissing the delay condonation application. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421084 The Court refused to condone a 1310-day delay in filing an appeal challenging the Tribunal's order interpreting Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. As a result, the application seeking condonation was dismissed, leading to the closure of both the appeal for interim relief and the main appeal. The Court emphasized the appellant's responsibility to ensure correct address details for order delivery and criticized the delay in seeking information about the appeal status, ultimately upholding the importance of timely action and dismissing the delay condonation application. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421084