https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421083 The HC addressed a case involving detained HI Crome Scrap due to discrepancies between tax invoice and E-way bill regarding IGST vs. CGST/SGST requirements and delivery locations. The petitioner claimed these were clerical errors, noting they had two GST-registered places. Despite the goods being released, the petitioner incurred Rs. 65,000 in demurrage charges during the 12-day detention. The Court acknowledged the unwarranted detention but disposed of the case since the goods had been released, while directing the State Tax Officer to review the representation and make an appropriate decision. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421083 The HC addressed a case involving detained HI Crome Scrap due to discrepancies between tax invoice and E-way bill regarding IGST vs. CGST/SGST requirements and delivery locations. The petitioner claimed these were clerical errors, noting they had two GST-registered places. Despite the goods being released, the petitioner incurred Rs. 65,000 in demurrage charges during the 12-day detention. The Court acknowledged the unwarranted detention but disposed of the case since the goods had been released, while directing the State Tax Officer to review the representation and make an appropriate decision. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421083