<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 741 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421075</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT considered the necessity of cash payments for political advertisements during state elections and the exceptions under Rule 6DD based on business exigencies, ultimately finding no disallowance under section 40A(3) warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 741 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421075</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT considered the necessity of cash payments for political advertisements during state elections and the exceptions under Rule 6DD based on business exigencies, ultimately finding no disallowance under section 40A(3) warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>