<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 725 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421059</link>
    <description>Sales of paper to registered manufacturing dealers against Form IA declarations under the Orissa Sales Tax Act were not treated as a contravention of Section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii). The Court read Section 4(1) as the charging provision and Section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) as governing deductions for sales to registered dealers for resale subject to tax, holding that Sections 6 and 7 do not create a fresh tax liability on the selling dealer merely because the buyer later uses the goods differently. Misuse or altered use by the purchasing dealer does not, by itself, defeat the seller&#039;s statutory deduction. The issue was answered in the negative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 725 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421059</link>
      <description>Sales of paper to registered manufacturing dealers against Form IA declarations under the Orissa Sales Tax Act were not treated as a contravention of Section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii). The Court read Section 4(1) as the charging provision and Section 5(2)(A)(a)(ii) as governing deductions for sales to registered dealers for resale subject to tax, holding that Sections 6 and 7 do not create a fresh tax liability on the selling dealer merely because the buyer later uses the goods differently. Misuse or altered use by the purchasing dealer does not, by itself, defeat the seller&#039;s statutory deduction. The issue was answered in the negative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>