<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421047</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction for maintenance charges. The decision was based on judicial precedence and arguments presented by the appellant, with the ITAT following the principle of consistency in allowing the deduction for maintenance charges against rental income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421047</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction for maintenance charges. The decision was based on judicial precedence and arguments presented by the appellant, with the ITAT following the principle of consistency in allowing the deduction for maintenance charges against rental income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>