<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301695</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of a Private Limited Company, holding that the amendments to section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2021 were clarificatory and applied retrospectively. The tribunal emphasized the legal distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions, noting consistency in decisions across various tribunals and High Courts. Consequently, the impugned additions under section 36(1)(va) were deemed to be deleted, in line with the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:10:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1332 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301695</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of a Private Limited Company, holding that the amendments to section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2021 were clarificatory and applied retrospectively. The tribunal emphasized the legal distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions, noting consistency in decisions across various tribunals and High Courts. Consequently, the impugned additions under section 36(1)(va) were deemed to be deleted, in line with the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>