https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421037 The HC addressed a case involving goods detained in transit due to tax discrepancies. The detention was based on possible misclassification of an inter-State transaction and inconsistency between delivery locations in the E-way bill and tax invoice. The applicant submitted a representation citing clerical error and explaining the discrepancy by noting two registered GST places. Despite submission on March 9, 2022, the State Tax Officer had not responded. The court issued notice returnable on March 17, 2022, directing the AGP to provide instructions by the next hearing and prioritized the matter on the Board. en-us Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421037 The HC addressed a case involving goods detained in transit due to tax discrepancies. The detention was based on possible misclassification of an inter-State transaction and inconsistency between delivery locations in the E-way bill and tax invoice. The applicant submitted a representation citing clerical error and explaining the discrepancy by noting two registered GST places. Despite submission on March 9, 2022, the State Tax Officer had not responded. The court issued notice returnable on March 17, 2022, directing the AGP to provide instructions by the next hearing and prioritized the matter on the Board. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421037