https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301686 The Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the first petitioner, the mandate holder, under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, while dismissing the petition against the second petitioner. The judgment emphasized the distinction in liability between the mandate holder and the account holder in cases involving dishonoured cheques, citing legal precedents to support the decision. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:03:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301686 The Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the first petitioner, the mandate holder, under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, while dismissing the petition against the second petitioner. The judgment emphasized the distinction in liability between the mandate holder and the account holder in cases involving dishonoured cheques, citing legal precedents to support the decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301686