<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Reviews Chairperson and Member Qualifications for Appellate Tribunal Under Benami Property Act for Constitutional Validity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62921</link>
    <description>Qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and Members of Appellate Tribunal - Constitutional validity of Sections 9 and 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 - It is true that the extent of judicial review that can be exercised in a given case is quite limited. Though a constitutional court can declare a provision to be unconstitutional, it should not give any direction to the Legislature to make an amendment in a particular way. The judicial restraint is, therefore, being hailed as a virtue. However, in a case where a direction has been given by the Apex Court to have the judicial independence, it is required to be followed by the High Courts as well as the Executive. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:18:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Reviews Chairperson and Member Qualifications for Appellate Tribunal Under Benami Property Act for Constitutional Validity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62921</link>
      <description>Qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and Members of Appellate Tribunal - Constitutional validity of Sections 9 and 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 - It is true that the extent of judicial review that can be exercised in a given case is quite limited. Though a constitutional court can declare a provision to be unconstitutional, it should not give any direction to the Legislature to make an amendment in a particular way. The judicial restraint is, therefore, being hailed as a virtue. However, in a case where a direction has been given by the Apex Court to have the judicial independence, it is required to be followed by the High Courts as well as the Executive. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Direct Taxes</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:18:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>