https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421035 Anticipatory bail was granted to an applicant proceeded against on summons under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged contravention under Section 132(1)(c). The applicant relied on parity with a co-accused partner who had already received anticipatory bail, and the Court treated the applicant's case as identical for bail purposes. Without expressing any view on the merits, the nature of the accusation and the parity with the co-accused were treated as sufficient grounds for relief, and the application was allowed. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421035 Anticipatory bail was granted to an applicant proceeded against on summons under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged contravention under Section 132(1)(c). The applicant relied on parity with a co-accused partner who had already received anticipatory bail, and the Court treated the applicant's case as identical for bail purposes. Without expressing any view on the merits, the nature of the accusation and the parity with the co-accused were treated as sufficient grounds for relief, and the application was allowed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421035