https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421016 The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant's appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- made under Section 69. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided adequate evidence regarding the source of the investment, and the Assessing Officer failed to investigate further. The reopening of the assessment was upheld, but the addition was deemed unjustified. en-us Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Aug 2022 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421016 The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant's appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- made under Section 69. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided adequate evidence regarding the source of the investment, and the Assessing Officer failed to investigate further. The reopening of the assessment was upheld, but the addition was deemed unjustified. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421016