<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for assessment years 2004-05, granting exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act for a jointly owned property. The appeal for assessment year 2005-06, regarding Long Term Capital Gains on land sale, was dismissed as the Revenue failed to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Appeals for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, decided ex-parte by the CIT(A), were set aside for denovo adjudication after the assessee&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for assessment years 2004-05, granting exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act for a jointly owned property. The appeal for assessment year 2005-06, regarding Long Term Capital Gains on land sale, was dismissed as the Revenue failed to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Appeals for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, decided ex-parte by the CIT(A), were set aside for denovo adjudication after the assessee&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>