https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420995 The court found Section 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 unconstitutional, following precedents emphasizing the need for judicial independence in the appointment of Judicial Members. The court directed the respondent to amend the provision to ensure only individuals with judicial experience are eligible for such appointments, in line with previous Supreme Court rulings. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive to amend the provision promptly, without any cost orders. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420995 The court found Section 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 unconstitutional, following precedents emphasizing the need for judicial independence in the appointment of Judicial Members. The court directed the respondent to amend the provision to ensure only individuals with judicial experience are eligible for such appointments, in line with previous Supreme Court rulings. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive to amend the provision promptly, without any cost orders. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420995