https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420984 The court denied the petitioner's bail application, citing the applicability of Section 45(1)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act post-amendment and the presence of prima facie evidence supporting allegations of gold diversion and money laundering. Due to the seriousness of the offenses, the risk of absconding, and potential witness tampering, the court concluded by rejecting the petitioner's bail plea, disposing of the case accordingly. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2022 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420984 The court denied the petitioner's bail application, citing the applicability of Section 45(1)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act post-amendment and the presence of prima facie evidence supporting allegations of gold diversion and money laundering. Due to the seriousness of the offenses, the risk of absconding, and potential witness tampering, the court concluded by rejecting the petitioner's bail plea, disposing of the case accordingly. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420984