https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420978 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging Ext.P2 order, which assessed the petitioner for concealing freight payments subject to service tax, justifying the extended limitation period due to intent to evade tax. The court held that Ext.P2 involved disputed facts and law, unsuitable for Article 226 interference. While dismissing the petition, the court preserved the petitioner's right to pursue statutory remedies, ensuring all contentions could be raised before the appellate authority without prejudice. en-us Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:52:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420978 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging Ext.P2 order, which assessed the petitioner for concealing freight payments subject to service tax, justifying the extended limitation period due to intent to evade tax. The court held that Ext.P2 involved disputed facts and law, unsuitable for Article 226 interference. While dismissing the petition, the court preserved the petitioner's right to pursue statutory remedies, ensuring all contentions could be raised before the appellate authority without prejudice. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420978