<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 716 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301679</link>
    <description>The court directed the insurance company to satisfy the award without applying Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and allowed the claimant to withdraw the award amount upon identification. All execution petitions related to the TDS issue were stayed pending a decision from a larger bench. The court emphasized the need for a consistent approach to the applicability of TDS on interest in motor accident claims and referred the matter to the Chief Justice for consideration by a larger bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 716 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301679</link>
      <description>The court directed the insurance company to satisfy the award without applying Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and allowed the claimant to withdraw the award amount upon identification. All execution petitions related to the TDS issue were stayed pending a decision from a larger bench. The court emphasized the need for a consistent approach to the applicability of TDS on interest in motor accident claims and referred the matter to the Chief Justice for consideration by a larger bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>