<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1159 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301673</link>
    <description>Vicarious criminal liability of company officers under Section 25 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 arises only where the company is prosecuted as the principal offender and the complaint contains the necessary foundational averments. Applying that principle, the court held that directors and authorised signatories could not be proceeded against when the company itself was not arraigned as an accused. The prosecution against the officers was therefore not maintainable and was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1159 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301673</link>
      <description>Vicarious criminal liability of company officers under Section 25 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 arises only where the company is prosecuted as the principal offender and the complaint contains the necessary foundational averments. Applying that principle, the court held that directors and authorised signatories could not be proceeded against when the company itself was not arraigned as an accused. The prosecution against the officers was therefore not maintainable and was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>