https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301671 A suit framed as one for declaration and injunction was held to require examination of both court-fee and jurisdiction valuation under the Court Fees Act and the Suits Valuation Act, with the plaintiff's chosen valuation needing a proper ad valorem fee where the relief was not a bare declaration. The declared valuation was accepted as reasonably related to the property value, but the fee paid on that valuation was found deficient. Because the requisite fee was not affixed, interim protection could not continue. The party array was also narrowed, as defendant no. 10 had no agreement, no pleaded relief against him, and no privity with the plaintiff. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:33:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301671 A suit framed as one for declaration and injunction was held to require examination of both court-fee and jurisdiction valuation under the Court Fees Act and the Suits Valuation Act, with the plaintiff's chosen valuation needing a proper ad valorem fee where the relief was not a bare declaration. The declared valuation was accepted as reasonably related to the property value, but the fee paid on that valuation was found deficient. Because the requisite fee was not affixed, interim protection could not continue. The party array was also narrowed, as defendant no. 10 had no agreement, no pleaded relief against him, and no privity with the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301671