<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301670</link>
    <description>A counterclaim for rendition of accounts that does not assert a definite, ascertained and liquidated monetary claim is not required to bear ad valorem court fee at the filing stage. Where the pleadings show only a tentative valuation linked to the amount that may emerge on final accounting, an undertaking to pay court fee once the amount due is adjudicated is sufficient to protect the revenue. The precedent on a specifically quantified claim was therefore inapplicable, and the counterclaim was not rejected for non-payment of ad valorem court fee at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:16:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 699 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301670</link>
      <description>A counterclaim for rendition of accounts that does not assert a definite, ascertained and liquidated monetary claim is not required to bear ad valorem court fee at the filing stage. Where the pleadings show only a tentative valuation linked to the amount that may emerge on final accounting, an undertaking to pay court fee once the amount due is adjudicated is sufficient to protect the revenue. The precedent on a specifically quantified claim was therefore inapplicable, and the counterclaim was not rejected for non-payment of ad valorem court fee at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>