https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301669 A plaint amendment that merely clarifies readiness and willingness, corrects pleaded facts, and does not alter the cause of action should ordinarily be allowed. A quantified claim for pre-suit mesne profits attracts ad valorem court fee on the amount claimed, but deficiency in court fee does not justify immediate rejection of the plaint without giving an opportunity to make good the shortfall. A claim for rendition of accounts based on an unascertained estimate does not by itself require ad valorem court fee or warrant rejection of the plaint. The amendment was permitted, and the court fee objection succeeded only to the limited extent of pre-suit mesne profits. en-us Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:12:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301669 A plaint amendment that merely clarifies readiness and willingness, corrects pleaded facts, and does not alter the cause of action should ordinarily be allowed. A quantified claim for pre-suit mesne profits attracts ad valorem court fee on the amount claimed, but deficiency in court fee does not justify immediate rejection of the plaint without giving an opportunity to make good the shortfall. A claim for rendition of accounts based on an unascertained estimate does not by itself require ad valorem court fee or warrant rejection of the plaint. The amendment was permitted, and the court fee objection succeeded only to the limited extent of pre-suit mesne profits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301669