https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301666 Territorial jurisdiction for specific performance of an agreement to transfer immovable property was held to depend on where the relief could be fully worked out. Reading the plaint as a whole, the court found that execution and registration of the sale deed, together with the vendor's obligation to deliver possession as incidental to specific performance, meant the dispute concerned immovable property outside Delhi. The proviso to Section 16 CPC did not apply because the relief could not be entirely obtained through the defendant's personal obedience in Delhi. The plaint was therefore ordered to be returned. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301666 Territorial jurisdiction for specific performance of an agreement to transfer immovable property was held to depend on where the relief could be fully worked out. Reading the plaint as a whole, the court found that execution and registration of the sale deed, together with the vendor's obligation to deliver possession as incidental to specific performance, meant the dispute concerned immovable property outside Delhi. The proviso to Section 16 CPC did not apply because the relief could not be entirely obtained through the defendant's personal obedience in Delhi. The plaint was therefore ordered to be returned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301666