<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 639 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420973</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2007-08 under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the reasons provided for reopening did not establish any failure to disclose material facts, as required by law. The court emphasized that the assessing authority must have clear evidence of non-disclosure before reopening assessments, which was lacking in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=676016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 639 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420973</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2007-08 under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the reasons provided for reopening did not establish any failure to disclose material facts, as required by law. The court emphasized that the assessing authority must have clear evidence of non-disclosure before reopening assessments, which was lacking in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>