<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1588 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2004-05, directing the AO to re-calculate the cost of construction and grant separate exemptions under Section 54F. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2005-06, upholding the bifurcation of sale proceeds into land and superstructure components. The final capital gains for the assessee were determined after considering these adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1588 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2004-05, directing the AO to re-calculate the cost of construction and grant separate exemptions under Section 54F. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2005-06, upholding the bifurcation of sale proceeds into land and superstructure components. The final capital gains for the assessee were determined after considering these adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>