<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301648</link>
    <description>Section 197(1) CrPC protects a public servant only when the alleged offence is reasonably and integrally connected with the discharge of official duty. Fabrication of records and misappropriation are not acts done in the course of official duty, even if the office created the to commit them. Sanction is not available for crimes merely facilitated by official position. Previous sanction was therefore not required, and the contrary view taken below was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 645 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301648</link>
      <description>Section 197(1) CrPC protects a public servant only when the alleged offence is reasonably and integrally connected with the discharge of official duty. Fabrication of records and misappropriation are not acts done in the course of official duty, even if the office created the to commit them. Sanction is not available for crimes merely facilitated by official position. Previous sanction was therefore not required, and the contrary view taken below was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>