<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1269 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301639</link>
    <description>An election petition alleging corrupt practice must plead concise material facts and full particulars, including the essential ingredients of the charge; absence of material facts is fatal, while some defects in particulars may be curable. Applying that pleading standard, allegations concerning bore wells and ambulances were treated as vague and incomplete because they omitted essential averments on consent, knowledge, deployment, beneficiaries, dates, places, and the manner of inducement. On the pleadings as framed, no complete cause of action was disclosed, and the petition was liable to be rejected at the threshold for want of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1269 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301639</link>
      <description>An election petition alleging corrupt practice must plead concise material facts and full particulars, including the essential ingredients of the charge; absence of material facts is fatal, while some defects in particulars may be curable. Applying that pleading standard, allegations concerning bore wells and ambulances were treated as vague and incomplete because they omitted essential averments on consent, knowledge, deployment, beneficiaries, dates, places, and the manner of inducement. On the pleadings as framed, no complete cause of action was disclosed, and the petition was liable to be rejected at the threshold for want of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>