<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 584 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the CIT(Appeals) for fresh examination after obtaining remand reports from the AO. The CIT(A) sustained some additions, including unaccounted payment to P.K. Ponnuraj and Zakath expenditure, while deleting others like unexplained investments and loans. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on sustained additions. Both the revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:39:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 584 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the CIT(Appeals) for fresh examination after obtaining remand reports from the AO. The CIT(A) sustained some additions, including unaccounted payment to P.K. Ponnuraj and Zakath expenditure, while deleting others like unexplained investments and loans. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on sustained additions. Both the revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>