<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and vacated the disallowance under Section 40A(2)(a) to the extent sustained by the CIT(A), thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the legitimate needs of the business while disallowing expenses and highlighted the practical differences in securing loans from related parties versus banks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:39:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and vacated the disallowance under Section 40A(2)(a) to the extent sustained by the CIT(A), thereby allowing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the legitimate needs of the business while disallowing expenses and highlighted the practical differences in securing loans from related parties versus banks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>