<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 563 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands related to service tax, irregular cenvat credit availment, and penalties under Section 78. The judgment emphasized the necessity of verifying claims, maintaining accurate records, and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation without wilful suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 563 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands related to service tax, irregular cenvat credit availment, and penalties under Section 78. The judgment emphasized the necessity of verifying claims, maintaining accurate records, and the inapplicability of the extended period of limitation without wilful suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>