<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420893</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the adjustment of Rs. 8,12,603 from the rebate claim, representing un-adjudicated interest dues, was unlawful. The appeal was allowed, directing the Authority to refund the balance rebate amount with interest within sixty days. This decision highlighted the limitations on the Authority&#039;s power to recover dues and emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 559 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420893</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the adjustment of Rs. 8,12,603 from the rebate claim, representing un-adjudicated interest dues, was unlawful. The appeal was allowed, directing the Authority to refund the balance rebate amount with interest within sixty days. This decision highlighted the limitations on the Authority&#039;s power to recover dues and emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>