<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 555 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420889</link>
    <description>Section 138 complaints must be tried by the court having local jurisdiction under Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as modified by the 2015 amendment. The court noted Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod but treated the amended provision as controlling. Where a complaint is instituted before a court lacking territorial jurisdiction, the trial court cannot proceed with the criminal case. The limitation objection was not pressed and was not decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:37:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 555 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420889</link>
      <description>Section 138 complaints must be tried by the court having local jurisdiction under Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as modified by the 2015 amendment. The court noted Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod but treated the amended provision as controlling. Where a complaint is instituted before a court lacking territorial jurisdiction, the trial court cannot proceed with the criminal case. The limitation objection was not pressed and was not decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>