https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420888 The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque in a granite business agreement. The Appellate Court upheld the conviction due to insufficient evidence of partial payments. The fine amount was increased, but the High Court set aside this enhancement, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence evaluation. The High Court dismissed the accused's revision petition challenging the conviction but allowed the petition regarding the fine amount, highlighting the importance of proper evidence assessment in cases involving dishonored cheques and contractual disputes. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:37:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420888 The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque in a granite business agreement. The Appellate Court upheld the conviction due to insufficient evidence of partial payments. The fine amount was increased, but the High Court set aside this enhancement, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence evaluation. The High Court dismissed the accused's revision petition challenging the conviction but allowed the petition regarding the fine amount, highlighting the importance of proper evidence assessment in cases involving dishonored cheques and contractual disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420888