<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1959 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301632</link>
    <description>The court upheld the revisional court&#039;s decision on the complaint&#039;s maintainability and remanded for further proceedings. It directed the trial court to address the jurisdictional issue based on the location of the drawee bank and consider the validity of cheques issued beyond the printed limit during the trial. The revision was rejected concerning the complaint&#039;s validity but instructed the trial court to adhere to jurisdictional directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1959 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301632</link>
      <description>The court upheld the revisional court&#039;s decision on the complaint&#039;s maintainability and remanded for further proceedings. It directed the trial court to address the jurisdictional issue based on the location of the drawee bank and consider the validity of cheques issued beyond the printed limit during the trial. The revision was rejected concerning the complaint&#039;s validity but instructed the trial court to adhere to jurisdictional directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>