<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420887</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was based on the Revenue Audit&#039;s opinion, not the Assessing Officer&#039;s independent belief. Consequently, all subsequent orders, including those under Section 92-CA(3), were set aside. The petition was allowed, quashing the notices and orders, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 553 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420887</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was based on the Revenue Audit&#039;s opinion, not the Assessing Officer&#039;s independent belief. Consequently, all subsequent orders, including those under Section 92-CA(3), were set aside. The petition was allowed, quashing the notices and orders, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>