<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28584</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to re-examine whether the confiscation of seized gold constituted a business loss and should be allowed as a deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in denying the adjustment of the loss against the assessed income without determining the nature of the confiscation. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for further consideration, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 29 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28584</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to re-examine whether the confiscation of seized gold constituted a business loss and should be allowed as a deduction under the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in denying the adjustment of the loss against the assessed income without determining the nature of the confiscation. The case was remanded back to the Tribunal for further consideration, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>