<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LUT NOT FILED</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117906</link>
    <description>Delay in furnishing a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) for zero-rated exports may be condoned and ex post facto acceptance permitted where exports have been effected and export proceeds received; such procedural lapse should not alone justify denial of a refund of unutilized input tax credit. Authorities may allow offline filing of LUT if the portal does not permit it and may levy penalties, but the substantive benefit of zero-rating should remain available provided revenue protection is not compromised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:55:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>LUT NOT FILED</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117906</link>
      <description>Delay in furnishing a Letter of Undertaking (LUT) for zero-rated exports may be condoned and ex post facto acceptance permitted where exports have been effected and export proceeds received; such procedural lapse should not alone justify denial of a refund of unutilized input tax credit. Authorities may allow offline filing of LUT if the portal does not permit it and may levy penalties, but the substantive benefit of zero-rating should remain available provided revenue protection is not compromised.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:55:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>