<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 28 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28580</link>
    <description>The court held that the relinquishment of the assessee&#039;s share in the disputed property constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; under section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court found that the amount received was not exempt from capital gains tax under section 47(ii). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Department, concluding that the relinquishment of the property was subject to capital gains tax, and awarded costs of Rs. 250 to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 28 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28580</link>
      <description>The court held that the relinquishment of the assessee&#039;s share in the disputed property constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; under section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court found that the amount received was not exempt from capital gains tax under section 47(ii). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Department, concluding that the relinquishment of the property was subject to capital gains tax, and awarded costs of Rs. 250 to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>