<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1258 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301608</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the determination of evaded rice purchases based on the loose parcha, finding the turnover proportionate to the business period. It directed the applicant to pay the tax on purchases to claim input tax credit on subsequent rice sales. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for reassessment in light of the Court&#039;s observations, partially allowing the revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1258 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301608</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the determination of evaded rice purchases based on the loose parcha, finding the turnover proportionate to the business period. It directed the applicant to pay the tax on purchases to claim input tax credit on subsequent rice sales. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority for reassessment in light of the Court&#039;s observations, partially allowing the revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>