https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301612 The appellate court reversed the Trial Court's judgment of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant provided substantial evidence, including a legal notice and witness testimonies, while the accused failed to effectively counter the claims. The appellate judge highlighted inconsistencies in the accused's defense and reversed the decision, directing the accused to pay the loan amount with interest or face imprisonment. The court emphasized the significance of evidence, responses to legal notices, and consistency in defense arguments in such cases. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2022 09:12:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301612 The appellate court reversed the Trial Court's judgment of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant provided substantial evidence, including a legal notice and witness testimonies, while the accused failed to effectively counter the claims. The appellate judge highlighted inconsistencies in the accused's defense and reversed the decision, directing the accused to pay the loan amount with interest or face imprisonment. The court emphasized the significance of evidence, responses to legal notices, and consistency in defense arguments in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301612