<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28575</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee company, holding that its manufacturing of copper wires did not qualify for tax benefits under the Income-tax Act. The Court clarified that for an industry to be considered a priority industry under item No. 7 of the Fifth Schedule, the cables manufactured must be specifically intended for electricity generation and transmission. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasized the importance of the specific purpose of the manufactured cables in determining eligibility for tax benefits. The judgment favored the Revenue, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for tax benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28575</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee company, holding that its manufacturing of copper wires did not qualify for tax benefits under the Income-tax Act. The Court clarified that for an industry to be considered a priority industry under item No. 7 of the Fifth Schedule, the cables manufactured must be specifically intended for electricity generation and transmission. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasized the importance of the specific purpose of the manufactured cables in determining eligibility for tax benefits. The judgment favored the Revenue, denying the assessee&#039;s claim for tax benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>