https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420842 The HC addressed a challenge to GST proceedings under Form GST MOV-10 where authorities had detained goods alleging tax evasion through bogus billing chains. While petitioner argued that invoking Section 130 confiscation was premature, they offered to deposit the tax amount of Rs. 7,73,091 with equivalent penalty for release of goods. The court, following precedent, directed the release of goods and conveyance upon deposit of Rs. 15,46,182 (covering tax and penalty) pending final adjudication. Interim relief was granted with notice issued to respondents for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420842 The HC addressed a challenge to GST proceedings under Form GST MOV-10 where authorities had detained goods alleging tax evasion through bogus billing chains. While petitioner argued that invoking Section 130 confiscation was premature, they offered to deposit the tax amount of Rs. 7,73,091 with equivalent penalty for release of goods. The court, following precedent, directed the release of goods and conveyance upon deposit of Rs. 15,46,182 (covering tax and penalty) pending final adjudication. Interim relief was granted with notice issued to respondents for further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420842