https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420832 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal and the Assessee's cross-objection for statistical purposes. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's challenge to the admission of additional evidence by the CIT(A) and confirmed the deletion of various additions made in the assessment, except for a separate addition of Rs. 11.80 lacs related to cash deposited by the mother. The Tribunal directed further verification for an addition of Rs. 5.03 lacs and restoration of agricultural income claimed by the Assessee. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:41:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420832 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal and the Assessee's cross-objection for statistical purposes. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's challenge to the admission of additional evidence by the CIT(A) and confirmed the deletion of various additions made in the assessment, except for a separate addition of Rs. 11.80 lacs related to cash deposited by the mother. The Tribunal directed further verification for an addition of Rs. 5.03 lacs and restoration of agricultural income claimed by the Assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420832