https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301589 Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal or irregular exercise of jurisdiction, and after the 1999 amendment it is further restricted for interlocutory orders unless the order, if made in favour of the applicant, would have finally disposed of the suit or proceeding. The High Court's revisional interference was therefore impermissible because it treated the matter as if in appeal. Interim mandatory relief also requires a strong prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience, and those settled tests were not applied; the refusal of such relief was wrongly disturbed and the judgments below were restored. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:42:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301589 Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal or irregular exercise of jurisdiction, and after the 1999 amendment it is further restricted for interlocutory orders unless the order, if made in favour of the applicant, would have finally disposed of the suit or proceeding. The High Court's revisional interference was therefore impermissible because it treated the matter as if in appeal. Interim mandatory relief also requires a strong prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience, and those settled tests were not applied; the refusal of such relief was wrongly disturbed and the judgments below were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301589