https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301588 A State policy on allotting developed land in lieu of compensation was treated as enforceable because it formed part of a continuing course of official action and could not be avoided on a technical objection under Article 166. The Court further held that entitlement under the policy was to developed plots, not undeveloped alternate sites, and that delay attributable to the State could not be used to dilute the promised benefit. It also found the Tribunal proceedings maintainable, as the development authority acted as the State's implementing instrumentality and the statutory jurisdiction was broad enough to examine the allotment dispute. en-us Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:42:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301588 A State policy on allotting developed land in lieu of compensation was treated as enforceable because it formed part of a continuing course of official action and could not be avoided on a technical objection under Article 166. The Court further held that entitlement under the policy was to developed plots, not undeveloped alternate sites, and that delay attributable to the State could not be used to dilute the promised benefit. It also found the Tribunal proceedings maintainable, as the development authority acted as the State's implementing instrumentality and the statutory jurisdiction was broad enough to examine the allotment dispute. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301588