<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420777</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata affirmed the disallowance of commission paid to the HUFs as the assessee failed to prove the rendering of services by the HUF entities, leading to the expenses not being considered incurred wholly and exclusively for the business under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 443 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420777</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata affirmed the disallowance of commission paid to the HUFs as the assessee failed to prove the rendering of services by the HUF entities, leading to the expenses not being considered incurred wholly and exclusively for the business under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>